Could Microsoft OneCare fix Windows?
May 19th, 2008 | by Rob Enderle
A few years back I used to regularly survey large companies and ask them how satisfied they were with their key vendors. One of the most interesting companies to survey on was Microsoft which had the widest range of responses of any vendor. While most would group around a number, Microsoft’s responses would polarize at opposite ends of the scale a large number of the customers that hated them and a large number those that loved them; with almost nothing in the middle.
In looking underneath the numbers, what seemed to make the difference was whether this firm had a broad services contract or not. Those companies that had a services contract were very pleased with Microsoft and those that had others providing core services or were doing it themselves were not. Since that time (and probably partially as a result of similar results) Microsoft itself saw Microsoft’s enterprise (large company) agreements now include mandatory service components.
However, for most of us we didn’t have the equivalent of a services contract with Microsoft until just recently and this is their One Care offering.
One Care: Fixing Windows
Microsoft Live OneCare (or just OneCare) is Microsoft’s answer to the mistake they made years ago that passed the responsibility for securing Windows off to third parties. That has, in my mind, been one of the three critical mistakes Microsoft has made since they first were founded. This created an environment where the people who secured the product were motivated to showcase the product’s vulnerabilities in order to sell their wares while creating no incentive for them to actually help improve the core offering.
Had Microsoft focused on security from day one, there likely would be far less viruses, patches, and published vulnerabilities. But they didn’t and with OneCare they moved to correct this early mistake. If it weren’t for concerns about Anti-Trust they would probably have put this into Windows by now which is where I think it always should have been.
But OneCare goes beyond security into system maintenance today and provides for a way for a remote technician to take over and fully diagnose a Windows System. Going forward it is expected to become a much more constant link between the user and Microsoft both to identify problems before they occur and to more quickly correct those problems when they do.
This should eventually create much the same dynamic we saw with Microsoft services for businesses, those that have OneCare will be happier with Windows than those that do not.
Experience with OneCare
OneCare installs with a simple management console which allows you to monitor the health of every PC you have running the product. This alerts you to machines that haven’t been backed up or where someone has turned off the AV or Firewall components either by accident or on purpose. The Firewall seems much less obtrusive than most other Firewalls, though it still does initially ask if you want to allow a web connected application to connect to the web.
Of the AV (anti-virus) products I’ve recently used, OneCare appears to be the least intrusive though, in the latest comparative test I have access to, it also still lags behind most of the other offerings but it also seems to be improving at the fastest rate. However my purpose is not to suggest you try OneCare but only to suggest that the product should help Microsoft connect with an increasing number of customers and through that connection improve how they are viewed by those customers and possibly also help improve the offering over time.
A Coming Problem for Apple?
Currently Apple is kind of where Microsoft was in the late 90s seemingly convinced that anything but very basic security should be handled by someone else and, even then, isn’t particularly important. But as Apple continues to gain market share it will increasingly become a target and without something like OneCare security firms will increasing look at Apple platforms as opportunities for increased revenue and more aggressively work to find the holes in the Mac platform to prove their point.
These security firms will also more aggressively market the shortcomings of the MacOS much like they currently do with Windows and Apple could still build more advanced security technology into their product to prevent the kind of problem Microsoft currently enjoys. I’m not sure enjoy is the proper word here.
A Better Microsoft A Better Windows 7 Because of OneCare
I think that by the time Windows 7 launches we will see a significant impact resulting from Microsoft aggressively trying to take ownership for the security of their primary operating system back in the form of a better overall offering. I also think that within the next 5 years most of us will have realized that to get the best experience with Windows we’ll need to be better connected to Microsoft through a future version of OneCare.
In the end, I think this probably should have been the way it initially was and that we are watching the correction of one of Microsoft’s biggest mistakes.
Post Your Comment...Comments
Rob Enderle on May 19th, 2008 at 2:29 PM:
You are right Trend Micro does nice work, I run into them more on the corporate side than the consumer side but they have a solid offering regardless. I've had a different experience with OneCare, particularly after the last update and personally prefer it, but my piece was more focused on how OneCare should help Microsoft touch more customers and better address their image and customer satisfaction issues. It wasn't intended to be a comparison between security offerings. Another very nice offering comes from Kaspersky Labs; these folks have always impressed the heck out of me.
Thanks for posting!
David on May 20th, 2008 at 11:38 PM:
I agree that Microsoft is trying to do the right thing with their OneCare product. I'm hesitant to use it since I've come to confide in AVG Security Suite as my preferred AV Software due to the lack of resource hogging as stated above in Norton and McAfee products. I hope to one day switch to LiveOneCare as the potential is limitless.
Pete on May 21st, 2008 at 8:56 AM:
I am with David, memory usage is really the big kicker with me. Most programs just suck it all up, and that's when they are in idle mode.
Ken on May 24th, 2008 at 11:17 PM:
OneCare
There is no repair function with OneCare so how good is this package. It lets Tojon download.delf spread thru my system until a reboot is required
Jack Thomas on Jun 21st, 2008 at 2:19 AM:
i also have AVG anti virus seems to work great but am tempted to try one care..however i have just down loaded m/soft IE8 BETA.... YIKES..it is slow..way slow even in IE 7 simulated mode
and find NO great benifiets to date..so I'm hoping my new one care goes a bit better.
jack thomas sunshine coast
australia
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.

James on May 19th, 2008 at 11:38 AM:
My experience with Microsoft OneCare was nto good at all. I found the program actually slowed down my system, was running and updating way too much, plus it's virus definitions were not as up-to-date as the other programs out there. But I agree that a more integrated approach would be better for the OS.
Norton software is a nightmore that locks down your system and makes it unusable. It's bloated and handicaps other software that's installed. McAfee is the same way.
I have found TrendMicros PCCillian works the best. It's non-intrusive, runs silently in the background and is updated often.