New York Threatens Comcast Over Child Porn
July 22, 2008 | by Geoff Duncan
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has threatened legal action against Comcast if it doesn't move quickly to block known child porn sites.
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has indicated his office will pursue legal action against cable operator and broadband provider Comcast if it doesn't quickly move to comply with a "code of conduct" drawn up by the state designed to impede online trafficking in child porn. Among other things, the code of conduct specifies that ISPs will block access to Web sites and bulletin board systems that distribute child porn.
Cuomo described Comcast as continuing "to drag its heels when it comes to taking every necessary action to eliminate online child porn from the Internet."
Three major New York-area Internet providers—Verizon, Sprint, and Time Warner Cable—pledged to uphold the code of conduct last July after the New York State Attorney General's office reportedly threatened legal action against them on charges of deceptive business practices and fraud. The AG's office conducted an eight-month investigation in while officers found the ISPs took little or no action on complaint from subscribers about child porn transiting their networks.
Comcast has not signed on to the code of conduct, but said in a statement it is working with the NY Attorney General's office and expects it will eventually sign on to the code of conduct. Comcast did sign onto an agreement with 18 other ISPs and 48 states' attorneys general to block access to sites entered in a blacklist maintained by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Post Your Comment...Comments
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.

Kevin on Jul 23rd, 2008 at 9:57 AM:
How is this necessary, when they've already signed on to the blacklist solution?